A fresh look at the profits and pitfalls of income trusts
Although tax rulings are complicating things for income trusts, they’re still performing well, says this advisory, which has three best buys.
We have the impression that the income trust market is turning
into a sort of game show. The host who bears a strong resemblance
to the finance minister keeps adding new challenges for those who
are chasing the big prize.
With over two and a half years to go before the final challenge
the income trust distribution tax of 2011 yet another obstacle
has been added.
The latest comes from the adjustment in the corporate tax
rate that will actually wind up costing individual shareholders more.
This in turn poses some challenging decisions for income trust themselves.
If things are getting this complicated, the blunt question
must be asked: why stay with income trusts at all?
Well, for one thing, income trusts are outperforming equities.
Thats the word we get from one of the leading authorities in the
field, the Income Trust Guide published by the Money
Reporter.
First well see why trusts are beating their corporate
counterparts on the market, then well double back and consider the
implications of a higher tax on dividends. Well finish with the
advisorys best buys.
Fewer financials, more resources
Income trusts have been outperforming Canadian equities virtually
since the beginning of the year, says this advisory. Even with a flurry
of recent gains, the S&P/TSX Composite Index has been trailing the
main trust index by several percentage points.
There are three reasons for this gap. A rather obvious one
is that the Composite index contains a lot more financial stocks than
does the trust index, and we scarcely need tell you that financials are
not in favour.
On the other hand, more trusts than stocks are concentrated
in the resource industry, and we scarcely need tell you that resources
are thriving.
A third and more subtle reason is that more stocks than trusts
have international exposure. As the U.S. flirts with recession, says the
advisory, income trusts that do most of their business here at home
are more sheltered from that eventuality. They are also sheltered
from some of the more damaging affects of the high Canadian dollar.
Still, the government keeps throwing sharp curves at the
trust market, creating some tough decisions for trusts and their unitholders.
Three options
To illustrate the knotty problems introduced by the governments
various tax rulings, the Income Trust Guide turns to a specific
case. TransForce Income Fund (TSX-TIF.UN) is shedding its trust
status and turning itself back into a corporation.
Heres what this means to unitholders. TransForce is
currently paying $1.59 per year in distributions, a yield of 18.9 per
cent. As a corporation, it will pay a dividend of $0.40, which would work
out to a yield of some 5 per cent. A high yield for common shares, but
a long way from 18 per cent.
This is a decision that all income trusts will have
to grapple with by the time 2011 rolls around, says the advisory.
One option is to remain a trust and adjust the payout to give unitholders
the same after-tax income.
Option number two is to remain a trust, keep the same payout
ratio, and let unitholders absorb the difference. By then, unitholders
will be able to treat the distribution as a dividend, grossing it up and
claiming the tax credit, but after-tax income will still be lower.
Option number three is to revert to corporate status and
pay dividends at the normal corporate rate of 4 per cent or so. The latest
tax ruling has complicated all of these options.
Paying the extra tax
The original trust tax of October 2006 implied that by 2011
investors would not really care whether they were getting $1.00 worth
of distributions or $1.00 worth of dividends. But that was based on the
dividend tax rate remaining the same. It has not.
The government has done a nifty two-step (or is it a shell
game?). First in the 2007 Economic Statement, it proposed to reduce the
corporate tax rate: from 19 per cent it would gradually fall to 15 per
cent in 2012. That promised a lower tax on dividends for shareholders
as well.
But then came step number two. Budget 2008 stipulated that
the dividend tax rate will also change, so that individual investors
will pay in extra tax all the money the corporation will save, explains
the advisory. The overall tax burden will be the same, but the individual
shareholder will be paying more, and the corporation proportionately less.
Its one thing, adds the advisory, to impose a tax on
income trust unitholders in the name of fair and equal tax treatment between
equities and trusts. And its understandable that in the name of
fairness, distributions should be treated the same as dividends for tax
purposes.
Its quite another to then ramp up the tax on
dividends which, for all intents and purposes, also applies to distributions
once 2011 arrives, concludes the advisory. Ernst & Young has
calculated that while corporate rates will fall from 19 per cent to 14
per cent over the next four years, taxpayers in the top tax bracket will
be headed in precisely the opposite direction, with their dividend rate
rising from 15 to 19 per cent.
Profits to be made
While those issues get sorted out over the next few years,
there are still profits to be made in the market. The advisory illustrates
with its three best buys for the month.
Yellow Pages Income Fund (TSX-YLO.UN) has been out
of favour through no fault of its own. The advisory thinks it is undervalued
and management agrees: it has launched a 5 per cent unit buyback that
will immediately raise distributable cash.
CI Financial Income Fund (TSX-CIX.UN) is also down
so far this year. But it still yields 8.3 per cent, has no exposure to
the dreaded commercial paper and has bright prospects for the future as
the mutual fund industry consolidates.
Series S-1 Income Fund (TSX-SRC.UN) has been doing
well. As a fund of trusts, it reflects the strong returns in the trust
market in general. If you want to add to your trust allocation without
disturbing the trusts you already own, this is the way to go, says the
Income Trust Guide.
Most game shows end in a half an hour. This one goes on for
about 32 months and if this advisory is right, there is more than enough
time to hit the jackpot. And hit it more than once.
|