How long will a recession last and what can be done about it?
It’s the length of a recession that should really matter to investors, says this analyst, who has several staunch buys in the meantime.
If everybody knew that a recession was on the horizon, how
come it took five months for the markets to panic? And if we are now entering
a U.S. recession, and all that might mean for Canada, when will it end?
And what should investors be doing about it?
These questions come with some answers attached. They come
from Mr. Richard Croft, writing in the latest issue of The
MoneyLetter. He also has a laundry list for the folks who can
do something to clean up the mess the big financial institutions,
the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, and the American consumer.
Mr. Croft has some recommendations for Canadian investors
who are making their way through this landscape of doubt and worry. They
begin at the heart of Bay Street.
A great big repetitive buy
The last time we checked in with Mr. Croft at The
MoneyLetter, just over a month ago, he was big on the big banks.
The credit crunch had sideswiped their shares, making them good buys at
their lowered prices.
He hasnt changed his mind. Yes, I know its
getting a bit repetitive, admits Mr. Croft, but right now,
the Canadian banks on my recommended list are a great big buy!
They are: Bank of Montreal (TSX-BMO), Bank of Nova
Scotia (TSX-BNS), Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (TSX-CM)
and Royal Bank of Canada (TSX-RY).
Moving down to Wall Street, the analyst has one more bank
to consider. This one doesnt warrant quite as much enthusiasm.
Taking some nerve
The biggest bank in the United States has suffered the biggest
pounding from the subprime mess. Citigroup (NYSE-C) has taken $18
billion worth of writedowns, cut its dividend, and otherwise not distinguished
itself during the crisis.
Since Mr. Croft recommended it as a buy/hold in October,
its share price has taken more of a beating than the analyst expected.
Assessing the damage, he comments: The CEO has departed, the executive
suite has been shaken out, and Citi has become a Dog of the Dow. But it
is still the biggest U.S. bank and its capital situation is improving.
His advice: Its going to take some nerve, but
keep holding. Extra gutsy investors may want to consider adding to holdings
or establishing new positions.
Mr. Croft has one more set of recommendations to ponder.
These are two bear funds he recommended.
More wrenching downside to come?
Since Mr. Croft recommended them in October, two short index
funds have done well. Horizon BetaPro S&P/TSX Bear Plus ETF
(TSX-HXD) for the Canadian index and ProShares Ultrashort S&P 500
(AMEX-SDA) for the U.S. have paid off since the markets hit the skids
in January.
The big question now, says the analyst, is
whether the near-20% correction from last years market peaks is
the sum total of this bearish market phase, or whether there is more wrenching
downside to come.
For speculators, its a personal thing. Are you
satisfied with your profit to date? If so, sell. If you think the markets
due for some more slipping and sliding in the next few months, then hold
for more gains, but remember theres a substantial risk of loss.
For the record, both funds are slightly above the price they
stood at when Mr. Croft penned this column a little over a week ago.
Now its time to find out how much wrenching downside
we can expect, and what can be done to get a little upside into the situation.
A shift in sentiment
Even though it was widely known in August that the credit
crunch was certain to create problems in the U.S. economy, the market
was simply flat for the last five months of 2007.
The real panic struck in January. The U.S. Labor Department
reported that non-farm payrolls had risen a paltry 18,000 in December
the weakest month-to-month change in four years and the
roof caved in.
A day later, Statistics Canada reported a loss of 19,000
jobs in December. That report was particularly disturbing,
says Mr. Croft, because most Canadian investors felt that oil and
commodities would cushion our exposure to a U.S. slowdown.
All of a sudden, it was no longer certain that low unemployment
would anchor the economy and reduce the likelihood of a recession.
But make no mistake, states Mr. Croft firmly.
The sell-off that swept through the market was driven by a shift
in sentiment, not a shift in fundamentals. The jobs numbers were not dramatic.
The analyst makes it clear that he is not suggesting there
will be no recession, or that it will leave Canada unaffected.
But I believe any slowdown will be closer to a normal
recession, rather than what some analysts are saying a protracted
pre-1980 style recession, which would be longer and more severe in impact.
Out of the woods by the end of the summer
Many analysts are wondering whether the U.S. Federal Reserve
Board is ready to deal with a severe recession, explains Mr. Croft.
And theres the rub! The severity of a U.S. recession,
whether it be +1.5 GDP growth (my best guess) or 0.5% (my worst-case
scenario), may not be enough to sway investor behavior. The bigger issue
will be duration.
A normal recession is defined as a docile, short-duration
slowdown, much as we have seen in recessions over the past 20 years. If
2008 follows that script, we could be out of the woods by the end of the
summer.
But thats not what investors are buying into now. There
is a wide belief that this one will be worse, the end result of unbridled
excesses, supported by questionable loan practices and propped up by major
U.S. investment banks, adds the analyst.
This reminds him of comments made some years ago by former
Bank of Montreal CEO Matthew Barrett. Asked about a survey in which consumers
had expressed their anger about banking practices and higher fees, Mr.
Barrett responded that the wrong question had been asked: it was not a
matter of whether consumers liked the banks, but whether they trusted
the banks.
If trust in the financial system is gone, we have a big problem
to deal with, in Mr. Crofts opinion.
Fixing the three-legged chair
If investors have lost confidence in the integrity
of financial institutions, it is the economic equivalent of removing one
leg from a three-legged chair, says Mr. Croft. This would
dramatically alter my definition of normal.
If we are to get out of the woods by the end of the
summer, we must strengthen the three-legged chair. There are nine
steps that must be followed to put the chair back together (lets
hope the instructions arent too hard to follow).
It starts with financial institutions. They must do three
things:
1) Come clean about the extent of their exposure to bad
loans.
2) Demonstrate that they can raise cash to offset that exposure (as
Citigroup, Merrill Lynch and CIBC have done).
3) Buy up lending institutions that will not survive without deep-pocketed
parents (as in the buyout of Countrywide Financial by Bank
of America).
The Fed must act now to:
4) Pump money into the system so that banks can survive
while they clean the subprime indiscretions off their books and
to allow for a secondary market for whats still out there.
5) Make serious cuts to interest rates (like the two already made in
January) to prop up the housing market and help homeowners keep their
homes.
6) Hope they can so this while keeping inflation under control.
Not least, American consumers and homeowners must step up
to:
7) Overcome a serious crisis of confidence in financial
institutions.
8) Clean up their personal balance sheets, in many cases through bankruptcy
courts.
9) Start spending.
The all-important consumer
The U.S. consumer drives 60 per cent of U.S. GDP, points
out Mr. Croft, not to mention much of the worlds economy. This all-important
consumer has been supporting double-digit growth in emerging economies
like Brazil, Russia, India and China (the so-called BRIC).
In the end, this may be the insurance policy that helps
the U.S. manage a recession, adds the analyst. Revived consumer
confidence can cushion a normal slowdown, although it cannot offset it
completely.
According to U.S. Bureau of Labor Standards, the consumer
accounts for $8 trillion of the U.S. economys $13.2 trillion GDP.
A 1 per cent drop in that spending would bring the GDP down to 1.5 per
cent (Mr. Crofts projected figure).
On the other hand, consumer spending makes up 30 per cent
of the GDPs of the BRIC economies. The middle classes in those economies
would have to step up their spending by at least 5 per cent in order to
offset a 1 per cent decline in U.S. consumer spending. Thats not
liable to happen overnight, as a slowing U.S. economy pulls down growth
figures overseas.
On the positive side, says Mr. Croft, I
think current sentiment is underestimating the Feds resolve. I believe
rate cuts will come faster and be larger than most investors think.
Nor is the U.S. labor market about to collapse, he adds.
Technically, the figures reflect full employment (and think how many workers
will be retiring soon).
Replacing fear with clarity
Looking at a half-full glass, Mr. Croft believes that the
liquidity crunch will be fixed, that safe mortgages in the U.S. will not
suffer, that the housing market will stabilize, that consumers will get
their act together, and that inflation will remain tame.
That should serve to calm investor sentiment.
When you replace fear with clarity, adds the
at MoneyLetter
analyst, you begin to focus on the outlook for earnings growth.
Thats not likely to start until the third quarter, which means the
market will take notice in the second quarter. Financial institutions,
particularly Canadian banks, will most likely lead that parade.
In conclusion, I am not looking for sharp gains in
the equity market in 2008. At best I expect single-digit year-over-year
returns in both the U.S. and Canadian equity markets, with most of the
growth coming in the second half.
Mr. Croft keeps repeating that the Canadian banks are bound
to lead the recovery parade. In not too many months, we hope to be able
to repeat his contention that the recovery parade is under way.
|